Gerunds After It's No Use and There's No Point In
When you want to express that an action will not have a successful or useful result, English relies on two common phrases: "it's no use" and "there's no point in." The tricky part for many learners is remembering that both expressions must be followed by a gerund (-ing form), not an infinitive. For example, you should say "It's no use worrying" (not to worry) and "There's no point in arguing" (not to argue).
In this hard-level challenge, you will identify the correct gerund forms, avoid common infinitive traps, and maintain the correct prepositional structures. You'll apply these rules across a variety of entertaining scenarios, from helping a frustrated spaceship mechanic and advising survivors on how to deal with zombies, to completing reports about cursed office printers and one-sided dragon sieges.
You'll work through 11 questions presented in a mix of single-choice, multi-choice, drop-down, and drag-and-drop formats.
Try the quiz to check your knowledge!
The correct answers are: It's no use trying to warn Abraham Lincoln anymore. There's no point in bringing this map of the Roman Empire. There's no point packing a saddle for a dinosaur.
After "it's no use" and "there's no point," you must use a gerund (verb + -ing).
"There's no point packing" is correct because the preposition "in" can be dropped in everyday English without changing the meaning or grammatical validity of the gerund that follows it.
being
Remember the golden rule: "It is no use" is followed directly by a gerund ("being"). It does not take a preposition like "in" or an infinitive like "to be".
in pretending
Conversely, "There is no point" requires the preposition "in" before the gerund ("in pretending").
Complete the frustrated spaceship mechanic's log entry.
The core reactor is completely fried. It's no use _______ to patch a level-five breach with galactic duct tape; we need a brand-new engine.
The correct answer is trying.
The expression "it's no use" is always followed directly by a gerund (the -ing form of a verb). We do not use the infinitive ("to try") or add prepositions like "in" after "use."
Help the IT technician write a warning note to his colleagues about the cursed office printer. Drag the correct words to complete the sentences.
Honestly, it's no use yelling at the machine because it feeds on your frustration. Furthermore, there's no point in kicking the printer since it is made of solid titanium.
Honestly, it's no use yelling at the machine because it feeds on your frustration.
The fixed expression is "it is no use" followed by a gerund (verb + -ing). We use the dummy subject "it" here, not "that" or "he".
Furthermore, there's no point in kicking the printer since it is made of solid titanium.
The fixed expression is "there is no point in" followed by a gerund. We use the dummy subject "there" and the preposition "in".
having locked
"It's no use" takes a gerund directly. Here, the perfect gerund "having locked" is used to emphasize that the useless action was already completed in the past.
in negotiating
"There's no point" must be followed by "in" + gerund. Using "to negotiate" or "for negotiating" is grammatically invalid.
The correct answers are: ...it's no use offering them a vegetarian alternative. ...there's no point in debating philosophy with them.
The expressions "it is no use" and "there is no point (in)" are always followed by the gerund form (offering, debating).
Using the infinitive (to explain, to suggest) with these specific phrases is grammatically incorrect.
Help the lost hiker finish his sarcastic journal entry about his friend's navigation skills. Drag the correct words to complete the sentences.
By the time the storm hit, I realized it was no use looking for the trail on a map that Bob was holding upside down. I also told him that there was no point in arguing about whose fault it was.
By the time the storm hit, I realized it was no use looking for the trail on a map that Bob was holding upside down.
Since the story is in the past tense ("the storm hit", "I realized"), we need the past tense "was". The expression "it was no use" requires a gerund ("looking").
I also told him that there was no point in arguing about whose fault it was.
The expression "there's no point" is followed by the preposition "in" and a gerund ("arguing").
Help the exhausted detective summarize a dead-end case to her partner.
The suspect has a rock-solid alibi backed by security footage. _______ him further without finding new evidence.
The correct answer is There's no point in interrogating.
In English, the correct fixed expressions are "there's no point in [doing something]" and "it's no use [doing something]." The distractors mix up these phrases by using the wrong dummy subject ("it" vs. "there"), the wrong preposition, or an infinitive verb instead of a gerund.
Complete the food critic's dramatic review of a terrible restaurant. Drag the correct words to complete the sentences.
The chef insisted the soup was a masterpiece, so we knew it was no use complaining to him about the taste. We also realized there was absolutely no point in salvaging the burnt appetizer, so we simply fed it to the stray dog outside.
The chef insisted the soup was a masterpiece, so we knew it was no use complaining to him about the taste.
After the phrase "it's no use" or "it was no use", we always use the gerund (the -ing form) of the verb.
We also realized there was absolutely no point in salvaging the burnt appetizer, so we simply fed it to the stray dog outside.
The correct preposition to follow "there is/was no point" is in, which must then be followed by a gerund (salvaging).
Complete the 19th-century ghost's diary entry about his modern haunting struggles.
These modern homeowners just ask their smart speakers to turn the lights back on! _______ the heavy antique chandelier if they don't even look up from their phones.
The correct answer is It's no use dropping.
The phrase "it's no use" must be followed directly by a gerund ("dropping"). If you wanted to use "point," the correct structure would be "there's no point in dropping." The other options incorrectly use the infinitive or omit the necessary preposition.
complaining
The phrase "it's no use" is directly followed by a gerund (-ing form). Adding the preposition "in" or using an infinitive ("to complain") is incorrect.
in trying
The phrase "there's no point" is followed by the preposition "in" + a gerund. Using an infinitive ("to try") is a common mistake!
Gerund
- ✅ I enjoy reading. — ❌ I enjoy to read.
- ✅ She's good at swimming. — ❌ She's good at to swim.
- ✅ He avoids making eye contact. — gerund after avoid
- ✅ Running is good exercise. — gerund as subject
A gerund is the -ing form of a verb functioning as a noun. It follows verbs like enjoy, avoid, finish, mind and ALL prepositions. Never use an infinitive where a gerund is required.
Rule: after a preposition (at, in, of, about, without) → always gerund. After enjoy, avoid, finish, mind, suggest, deny → always gerund.
Negation
- ✅ I don't see anything. — ❌ I don't see nothing. (double negative in standard English)
- ✅ She never goes out. — never already negates (no doesn't needed)
- ✅ He doesn't like coffee. — do-support for negation
- ✅ Nobody came. — negative subject (no auxiliary needed)
Negation uses not after an auxiliary/modal, or do-support when there's no auxiliary. One negative per clause in standard English — never, nobody, nothing already negate without adding not.
Rule: one negative element per clause. I don't see anything or I see nothing — never both together in standard English.
Past tense
- I walked home. — simple past (completed action)
- I was walking when it rained. — past progressive (in progress)
- I had already left when she arrived. — past perfect (earlier past)
- I had been waiting for an hour. — past perfect progressive (duration up to a past point)
Four past tense forms: simple past (done), past progressive (was happening), past perfect (had already happened), past perfect progressive (had been happening). Each encodes different timing relative to other past events.
Pattern: simple past = the story's main timeline. Past progressive = background action. Past perfect = flashback to something even earlier.
Phrase
- the red car — noun phrase (functions as one noun unit)
- on the table — prepositional phrase
- has been running — verb phrase
- very quickly — adverb phrase
A phrase is a group of words that functions as a single unit WITHOUT a subject + verb pair. Types: noun phrase, verb phrase, prepositional phrase, adjective phrase, adverb phrase.
Key distinction: a phrase lacks a subject-verb pair. If it has subject + verb → it's a clause, not a phrase. Phrases are the building blocks clauses are made of.
Preposition
- ✅ interested in — ❌ interested on
- ✅ good at football — ❌ good in football
- ✅ depend on — ❌ depend of
- ✅ arrive at the station — ❌ arrive to the station
Prepositions link nouns to the rest of the sentence: time (at 5pm), place (in London), manner (with care), abstract (afraid of). Most are idiomatic — the "correct" preposition must be memorised with each verb/adjective combination.
Rule: there is no universal rule. English prepositions are learned by combination: interested IN, good AT, depend ON, afraid OF. Your native language's equivalent will often mislead.
Subject
- ✅ The list of items is wrong. — subject = list (singular), not items
- ❌ The list of items are wrong. — trapped by nearest noun
- ✅ Running is good exercise. — gerund as subject
- ✅ What he said surprised me. — clause as subject
The subject is the noun/pronoun/phrase before the verb that controls its number and person. Finding the true subject — especially through prepositional phrases — is the key to subject-verb agreement.
Rule: strip away prepositional phrases between subject and verb. Whatever's left is the true subject. The list (of items) is wrong.
Verb
- walk → walk / walks / walked / walked / walking (5 forms, regular)
- go → go / goes / went / gone / going (5 forms, irregular)
- be → am/is/are/was/were/be/being/been (8 forms)
- can → can / could (modal: only 2 forms, no -s, no -ing)
A verb is the one word class every English sentence requires. Carries tense (when), aspect (duration), mood (attitude), and voice (active/passive). Regular verbs add -ed; ~200 irregular verbs have unpredictable past forms.
Key insight: fix your verbs and most grammar problems disappear. Wrong tense, wrong agreement, wrong form — verb errors account for the majority of grammatical mistakes.
Verb tense
| Simple | Progressive | Perfect | Perfect Progressive | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past | worked | was working | had worked | had been working |
| Present | work(s) | am working | have worked | have been working |
| Future | will work | will be working | will have worked | will have been working |
Verb tense = time (past/present/future) × aspect (simple/progressive/perfect) = 12 forms. Each slot has a specific job — not just "when" but "how the action relates to its time frame."
Key insight: most learners don't need all 12 at once. Simple covers 80% of communication. Add perfect and progressive as needed.
Collocations
- ✅ make a decision — ❌ do a decision
- ✅ strong coffee — ❌ powerful coffee
- ✅ heavy rain — ❌ strong rain
- ✅ highly unlikely — ❌ very unlikely (grammatical, but less natural)
Collocations are word pairs that English habitually puts together. Both options may be grammatically valid, but one sounds native and the other doesn't.
Pattern: there's no logic to predict them — you make decisions but do homework, you have strong coffee but heavy rain. They must be learned as chunks, not deduced from rules.
Idiom
- It's raining cats and dogs. — means "raining heavily" (not literal animals)
- Break a leg! — means "good luck" (not an injury wish)
- Spill the beans — means "reveal a secret"
- Kick the bucket — means "to die" (no actual bucket involved)
Idioms are fixed phrases whose meaning can't be guessed from the individual words. They must be memorised as complete units — word-by-word translation from another language almost always fails.
Pattern: if a phrase is literally absurd but everyone uses it with a specific meaning → it's an idiom. Learn it as a chunk, not as individual words.
B2 | Upper Intermediate
- ✅ If I had studied harder, I would have passed. — third conditional
- ✅ The report is being reviewed by the committee. — passive progressive
- ✅ Having finished the exam, she left. — participle clause
- ✅ He denied having taken the money. — complex verb pattern
These are B2 patterns — the CEFR upper-intermediate level. At B2 you handle mixed conditionals, all passive forms, participle clauses, and can argue a point clearly. This is the level most universities and employers require.
Marker: if you can write a structured essay and debate an abstract topic, you're B2.
Hard
- Had she not intervened, the situation would have escalated. — inverted conditional
- All distractors are grammatically plausible in other contexts
- Multiple rules interact (e.g., tense + aspect + modality)
- Context determines the answer — no single "rule" is enough
Hard marks upper-intermediate to advanced challenges: B2+, interacting rules, edge cases, plausible distractors, and contexts where pattern-matching fails.
Use "Hard" when Easy/Medium feel trivial and you want to test whether you actually understand a rule versus just recognising surface patterns.